Not too long ago I had a nice discussion with Jonathan Pearce that lead to his posting about the Münchhausen trilemma.
This is an interesting thing I picked up on while debating with a (surprisingly nice) Presuppositional Apologist.
The interesting thing that came about was that once both theists and atheists come to accept the Münchhausen trilemma as the major issue in epistemology that it is, I think that secularism in terms of governance follows as a result. This post is to explain why I think that to be the case.
It should be said that if you haven't read up on the Münchhausen trilemma, follow the links above to check it out before continuing with this article.
Showing posts with label A Tippling Philosopher. Show all posts
Showing posts with label A Tippling Philosopher. Show all posts
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Monday, September 2, 2013
Virtual Beers with Jonathan Pearce, Justin Schieber - Evidential Problem of Evil!
I just finished up another awesome Virtual Beers session with Jonathan Pearce and Justin Schieber where we discuss the Evidential Problem of Evil and the problems with common theistic responses.
I think that we packed in a lot of philosophical meat in this session and it was honestly a blast!
Extra geek cred if anyone can identify what the wall scroll to the left of me is (ie. not the Dragon Ball Z one). I'd be pleasantly surprised to see if anyone can!
EDIT: The answer is Terry Bogard from Fatal Fury/King of Fighters. Here's the actual source artwork, from Real Bout Fatal Fury 2
I think that we packed in a lot of philosophical meat in this session and it was honestly a blast!
Extra geek cred if anyone can identify what the wall scroll to the left of me is (ie. not the Dragon Ball Z one). I'd be pleasantly surprised to see if anyone can!
EDIT: The answer is Terry Bogard from Fatal Fury/King of Fighters. Here's the actual source artwork, from Real Bout Fatal Fury 2
Thursday, July 18, 2013
Misunderstandings regarding Craig, Kalam, and Relativity
Jonathan Pearce is having a "Why I am a Christian" series and in the inevitable discussion on Vincent Torley's piece it seems Vincent has done some criticism of my Countering the Kalam series. Vincent alleges that I've gotten my science wrong and that I have misrepresented William Lane Craig.
I believe this is all based on a misunderstanding of some of the science involved and in a superficial reading of Craig's work in which he's talking about how different philosophies of time impact the cosmological argument.
I believe this is all based on a misunderstanding of some of the science involved and in a superficial reading of Craig's work in which he's talking about how different philosophies of time impact the cosmological argument.
Monday, April 8, 2013
A Tippling Philosopher interviews Counter Apologist
So this past weekend I was interviewed by A Tippling Philosopher, which was really a lot of fun. We spoke a bit about my deconversion and the argument from hell that convinced me to leave Christianity, as well as a bunch of other topics. Check it out and be sure to check out his blog, there's always something great to read over there, and unlike me he updates pretty regularly!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)