One of the most common apologetic acrobatics that happens
here is that the apologist will try and white wash hell to make it seem as
though eternal conscious torture isn’t all that bad.
First, let’s take a look at how the Christian bible,
specifically the New Testament and Jesus describe hell:
There are many reasons why you should not be a Christian,
but one of the most powerful ways to cause a believer to question their faith
is to show them how terrible their supposed god is.The vast majority of people who identify as
Christian are wonderful, loving, good people – and they’ve probably never
thought through exactly how terrible their god would have to be if it existed.
One of the most powerful ways to show this is through the
argument from the existence of hell. This argument is powerful because it is an
internal critique.It assumes the truth
claims of Christianity for the creation and final destiny of the universe, two
things that really can’t be whitewashed over as easily as the particularly
nasty bits of slavery and genocide in the bible. That doesn’t mean the apologists won’t try,
but this part of Christian theology is so horrible that they’re going to have a
hard time of it.
So let’s start with the argument in a simple syllogism:
It’s pretty extraordinary for me to get so fired up about something in the
morning that I’ll put off finishing the coffee to start a response, but that's what happened this morning when I checked out Randal Rauser's latest post.
What I'd like to point out before I start ripping into what the guy posted is that I actually think Randal has got the character of a champion, especially when you consider him in comparison to other Christian apologists. He rejects the idea that god commanded the genocides of the Old Testament, that god actually endorsed slavery in the Old Testament, or that god will inflict eternal conscious torture on anyone in hell.
That said, I can't help but get frustrated by Randal's apologetics given that he's misrepresenting so many standard positions atheists hold.
So I posted the following as a comment reply on his blog, but I figured it wouldn't be a bad idea to publish it here as well.